Kluang Running

running · Jun 19, 2026TE 3.6

Distance

6.01 km

Duration

40:05

Avg Pace

6:41 /km

Avg HR

159bpm

Max HR

185bpm

Recovery HR

39bpm

Calories

458kcal

Route
Elevation
↑ 56 m↓ 62 m
Splits
#DistTimePaceAvg HR
11.00 km6:286:28 /km139 bpm
21.00 km6:146:14 /km157 bpm
31.00 km6:506:51 /km163 bpm
41.00 km7:007:00 /km159 bpm
51.00 km6:426:42 /km166 bpm
61.00 km6:476:47 /km167 bpm
70.01 km0:026:27 /km170 bpm
Heart Rate Zones
Z1 4%Z2 13%Z3 37%
Running Dynamics

Cadence

172spm

Stride Length

0.87m

Steps

6,966

Training Effect

Aerobic TE

3.6

Anaerobic TE

0.6

Training Load

138

Pre-activity Readiness

Training Readiness

84/ 100

Sleep Score

61/ 100

Sleep Duration

5h 28m

AI Summary

Solid 6 km tempo effort at 6:41/km with strong aerobic development (3.6 TE), though you ran 2 km short of the planned 8 km easy run.

You executed a significantly harder workout than planned—this was a threshold/tempo run rather than the easy 8 km confidence-builder you intended. Your HR profile (16+ min in Z4, peak 185 bpm) and pace progression confirm you pushed into high-intensity territory, particularly from km 3 onwards. The leg felt good enough to accelerate, but this wasn't the conservative test run you planned. Physiologically, the signals are positive: excellent recovery HR (39 bpm at 1 min post), solid aerobic training effect (3.6), and consistent cadence (172 spm). However, the 2 km shortfall suggests either fatigue set in or you made a real-time decision to cut the run short—either way, you under-completed the volume. Actionable takeaway: Next easy run, dial back the pace (aim for Z2/lower Z3) and commit to the full distance before deciding intensity. Build confidence through completing planned volume at conversational effort, not by racing hard and stopping short.

Z4 41%
Z5 4%

Vert. Oscillation

7.9cm

Ground Contact

265ms

Vertical Ratio

9.1%

Body Battery

31 – 76